A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building performs at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of established citizens. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly within a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has due to the fact come to be emblematic in the depth of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they ended up meant to Acquire visual proof of the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions documented, describing how the two Guys entered the drinking water through severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these actions had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail with the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second within the authorized timeline.
On the core in the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging paperwork, maps, and ailments connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple just endeavoring to build a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion Paul Feely and Rene Collier intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly diverse professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.